(11-04-2011, 06:05 PM)Evilness Wrote: Prabhu you are complety wrong here. Notice that SS damage becomes higher then C&B under 75% faculty. It is very hard to keep hero over 75% half of the battle if he damages himself, which means SS has better average damage. The second benefit is that SS can be an excelent tank due the the fact damage increases with less faculty. And thirdly you are wrong about the healer. Unlike C&B, SS hero is always placed in front and extra heal can just increase survivalability. Most of the battle unit is still under 75% faculty and does more damage then C&BWell, it's pretty late for me to see this thread. SS heroes are more commonly used(even I used Hemera for quite a while now) compared to C&B heroes. The point is we haven't seen the comparison coming from someone who is in 140 maps or beyond and who says C&B is useless compared to SS(after trying both ofc). Otherwise, it's only our estimates. AFAIK C&B comes into picture only in later part compared to SS.
Healer being counter-productive to SS heroes is something you have to try and see, numbers aren't totally conclusive.
(12-26-2011, 06:59 PM)Guest Wrote: Is there a difference between a maia(or any hero) with 100% faculty (8000 troops) vs an exact same maia with 100%faculty with 11k troops as far as damage goes?When Maia has the same faculty percent in both cases(say 100%), there is no difference in damage output.
Now, if Maia takes say 6k damage, first Maia will end up with 25% faculty and second Maia will end up with 50% faculty(approx.). Now the damage output will be different - higher faculty will be able to dish out higher damage.